Padilla Law, P.C. - Colorado and New Mexico Attorneys At Law. 970-764-4547
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Beth A. Padilla
    • Paul E. Padilla
  • Areas of Practice
  • First Draft Blog
  • Client Testimonials
  • Resources
  • Contact Us

Equal Treatment For Men & Women Seemingly Expands Uniform Parentage Act

8/8/2012

0 Comments

 
This week, the New Mexico Supreme Court announced its decision in Chatterjee v. King (Opinion # 2012-NMSC-019), which may significantly expand the rights of non-parents who have taken care of their significant-other’s children.

The facts of the case are pretty straightforward. Two women in a long-term relationship decided to adopt a child together. Because of limitations on adoption by same-sex couples, only one woman was able to legally adopt the child. After the adoption was complete, but before the second woman could legally adopt the child, the couple broke up. Needless to say, after the breakup, the non-adoptive woman wanted to visit and maintain her relationship with the child.

What makes this case interesting is how the court reached its decision. Generally speaking, to have the right to visit a child you must be either a natural parent, meaning you gave birth to the child, or you must be the legal / adoptive parent, which means that you have legally established yourself as the parent. If you cannot show either form of relationship, then you must establish visitation as a third party, such as a grandparent, which is much more difficult to do.

Historically, men and women have been treated differently when dealing with child custody and support for obvious reasons. For a woman, it is much easier to prove that she is the natural or biological parent: she was there when it happened. But, for men, there is much more grey area as to proving who the father is. As a result, under the New Mexico Uniform Parentage Act (UPA), a father can establish a presumption that he is a natural parent by showing four things:
  • Personal relationship with the child;
  • Financial relationship with the child;
  • Custodial relationship with the child; and
  • Holding out the child as their own to others.

Therefore, because this alternate test to prove a parental relationship exists for a man, the court held that it should also be available for a woman.

This will clearly impact people who have acted as parents to children, but who have never formally established a legal relationship through adoption, as well as same-sex couples who were previously prevented from creating such rights.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Padilla Law, P.C.

    First Draft is a collaborative effort between Beth and Paul Padilla, both equity partners in the firm, and is intended to give you a brief overview of current legal topics and let you know what effects those issues may have in your life.

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    February 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    October 2018
    May 2018
    July 2017
    March 2017
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    May 2015
    April 2015
    September 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011

    Categories

    All
    Administration
    Banking
    Community
    Constitution
    Criminal
    Employment Law
    Environmental
    Family
    Immigration
    Insurance
    Juvenile
    Land Use
    Marijuana
    Oil & Gas
    Probate
    Property
    Real Estate
    Recreation
    Small Business
    Technology