Padilla Law is pleased to announce the addition of Beth A. Padilla to the firm. Beth will join the firm as an Equity Partner and will expand the firm’s areas of practice by adding Immigration & Naturalization Law, as well as Family & Domestic Law.

Most recently, Beth was Of Counsel with the Van Der Jagt Law Firm in Denver, Colorado. In her Immigration practice, Beth handles removal defense for aliens before the Immigration Judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals. She also assists clients with asylum, family based petitions, naturalization petitions, U visas for victims of crime, and Violence Against Women Act petitions. In addition, she has given multiple Know Your Rights presentations in Spanish throughout communities in the Front Range. In her Family Law practice, Beth handles cases involving abduction prevention, asset distribution, child custody, divorce, and spousal maintenance.

Beth’s full biography, profile, and contact information are available on the Padilla Law website, www.padillalawpractice.com, and Beth is currently accepting new clients.

Padilla Law’s primary areas of practice now include Business Transactions, Civil Litigation, Criminal Defense, Family & Domestic Law, Immigration & Naturalization, and Wills & Trusts.

Padilla Law is excited to announce the firm’s relocation to Durango, Colorado, as of July 1, 2012. Because Durango is uniquely positioned near the Colorado-New Mexico border, the relocation will allow the firm to balance its caseload between the two states evenly.

In Colorado, the firm’s primary geographic range will shift from the Front Range to cover the Western Slope and the communities throughout the southern portion of the state. In New Mexico, the firm will offer its services throughout the northern portion of the state, including Albuquerque and Santa Fe.

Although the final details of the firm’s new corporate offices in Durango are yet to be completed, correspondences and inquiries can be sent to the firm’s new mailing address immediately.

Padilla Law, P.C.
P.O. Box 2835
Durango, Colorado 81302-2835

Padilla Law would like to extend its thanks and gratitude to the individuals, businesses, and communities along the Front Range that have enabled and encouraged the firm to grow and thrive.

Please look for future announcements relating to the firm’s relocation and expansion.

This week, the New York Dept. of Health announced a new measure, sponsored by Mayor Bloomberg, to ban the sale of large sodas and other sugary drinks, 17 ounces or larger. The ban would apply to restaurants and any other establishments that receive health inspections for food service.

Mayor Bloomberg explained that the measure is a direct attack on obesity and its related health issues. Multiple studies released over the last several years indicate that obesity is now the most costly and serious health issue in America, having overtaken other health problems such as smoking and cancer.

Soda consumption is at the forefront of the obesity issue, and I was surprised to learn that a 17-ounce soda contains approximately 27 cubes of sugar and a 51-ounce soda contains approximately 87 cubes. Mayor Bloomberg argues that by limiting the size of sodas and other sugary drinks, consumers will consume less. Additionally, Mayor Bloomberg cites studies that show consumers are less likely to buy two sodas at a time, even if they want more than a 16-ounce drink.

In all honesty, I am very conflicted over this issue. On one hand, I applaud Mayor Bloomberg for taking a proactive stance on a serious and growing national epidemic. But, on the other hand, the idea of the government limiting the amount and type of beverage that comes with a value meal sends shivers down my spine.

I advocate for self accountability and responsibility. I believe everyone must sleep in the bed that they make. But, the deciding factor that I see with this issue is its affect on kids. The ban does not restrict sales in grocery or convenience stores. So, parents are free to buy and keep their houses stocked with whatever they choose.  Also, anyone can go into a corner store and buy any kind of soda or drink that they want. Therefore, the major impact of this ban on fast food restaurants, where many kids order and purchase food on their own.

Because the practical effect of the ban is to limit the negative repercussions of fast food and take-out, and it doesn’t really do more than that, I support the measure.  Although it’s always a slippery slope when creating new regulations and limits imposed by the government, on balance, I think Mayor Bloomberg’s measure does more good than harm and I hope it ultimately gets passed.